SPJ Publication

Open Access Original Research

Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Versus Ketamine for Paediatric Imaging: A Comparative Study

*

* Corresponding author: Dr. Subham Kumar Singh

  1. Received12 Dec 2025
  2. Accepted24 Feb 2026
  3. Published21 Mar 2026

Abstract

Background: Paediatric imaging often requires sedation to minimize movement and obtain diagnostic-quality images. Midazolam and ketamine are commonly used agents, but their comparative efficacy, recovery characteristics, and safety profiles may differ.

Methods: A prospective comparative observational study was conducted from August 2025 to April 2026 among 240 paediatric patients requiring sedation for diagnostic imaging. Participants were equally allocated to a midazolam group (n = 120) and a ketamine group (n = 120). The primary outcome was successful completion of imaging without significant movement or rescue sedation. Secondary outcomes included time to adequate sedation, recovery time, physiological stability, and sedation-related adverse events.

Results: Successful imaging completion was achieved in 105 (87.5%) patients in the midazolam group and 113 (94.2%) in the ketamine group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = .071). Ketamine produced a significantly faster onset of adequate sedation than midazolam (6.9 ± 2.1 vs. 8.6 ± 2.4 minutes; p < .001). Recovery was significantly shorter with midazolam (38.4 ± 9.7 vs. 43.7 ± 10.8 minutes; p < .001). Oxygen desaturation occurred in 4.2% and 2.5% of patients, respectively (p = .475)

Conclusion: Both midazolam and ketamine provided effective and clinically acceptable sedation for paediatric imaging. Ketamine offered faster sedation onset, whereas midazolam provided faster recovery, supporting individualized sedative selection based on patient and procedural requirements.

Keywords

References

  1. Coté CJ, Wilson S; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics. 2019;143(6):e20191000. AAP Publications

  2. Arthurs OJ, Sury M. Anaesthesia or sedation for paediatric MRI: advantages and disadvantages. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(4):489-494. PubMed

  3. Aldahmashi K, et al. Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:111-117. PubMed

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):e20161212. AAP Publications

  5. Jain K, Ghai B, Saxena AK, Saini D, Khandelwal N. Efficacy of two oral premedicants: midazolam or a low-dose combination of midazolam-ketamine for reducing stress during intravenous cannulation in children undergoing CT imaging. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(4):330-337. PubMed

  6. Parker RI, Mahan RA, Giugliano D, Parker MM. Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children. Pediatrics. 1997;99(3):427-431. PubMed

  7. Sury MRJ, Hatch DJ, Deeley T, Dicks-Mireaux C, Chong WK. Development of a nurse-led sedation service for pediatric imaging. [Relevant pediatric imaging sedation literature].

  8. Green SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department procedural sedation with ketamine: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):449-461.

  9. Green SM, Li J. Ketamine in adults: what emergency physicians need to know about patient selection and adverse events. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):449-461.

  10. Khajeh M, et al. Oral midazolam-ketamine versus midazolam alone for procedural sedation of children undergoing computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2015;3(2):67-72. PubMed

  11. Schulte-Uentrop L, Goepfert MS. Anaesthesia or sedation for MRI in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(4):513-517. PubMed

  12. Salman JM, Al-Asadi JN, Abdul-Ra'oof HH, Ahmed JH, Reshak AH. Comparison of intramuscular versus intravenous ketamine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination. Wiad Lek. 2023;76(1):198-204. PubMed

  13. Kim J, et al. Drug selection for sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020;37(3):201-207. PubMed